The Islamabad court has rejected the EC’s request for an initial hearing of the ToshaKhana case opposed to Imran Khan.
Let us tell you that the Additional Judge of the District or Sessions Court of ISL, whose name is ‘Zafar Iqbal’, heard the request write by the ELECTION COMMISSION in which two of “Imran Khan‘s” lawyers reached in the COURT.
When the hearing was started, the court asked what do you say about this request, on which Imran Khan’s lawyer said that he should explain the Argument for the initial hearing of the ToshaKhana case.
According to the order of the ECP, the date of hearing was taken on April twenty-nine, but suddenly the (EC) remembered that the case should be heard soon.
In this, PTI’s Lawyer Khawaja Haris said that this case should be decided without the intervention of the EC, but you should explain why discrimination is being done in the judgment to schedule an initial hearing against Khan Sahib. While the ECP wants the Chairman of PTI to be charged.
Along with this, the lawyer further said that he strongly opposes the initial audit of this case.
After that, lawyer @Amjad Pervaiz said in his statement that it is amiss to make such allegations opposed to the EC, whereas the SC had ruled that the courtroom should give its verdict on “Corrupt Practices” within 3 months. If a person files an application then a judgment should be taken within 3 months or the letter proffered by the EC is in accordance with the merit or decision of the SC.
On this, the court after listening to all the things said to wait for 10 minutes so that the judgment will be pronounced.
After which the COURT, giving its verdict, adjourned the initial hearing of the ToshaKhana case of the EC.