In the CIPHER CASE, Chief PTI IK’s LAWER Naeem Panjotha was informed by Judge Abul Hasnat of the Special Court of Official Secrets Act that either the room or the wall of Imran Khan’s cell in Adiala Jail was broken.
The case in Adiala Jail was heard by Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain of the Official Secret Act Special Court.
Naeem Panjotha, the Chief PTI’s legal advisor and spokesperson, entered Judge Abul Hasnat’s courtroom.
The Attorney Naeem Panjutha stated that the order is not being followed and that attorneys are not permitted to visit Chief PTI in jail.
According to the JAIL manual, administrative matters are handled in the jail, the judge stated.
Attorney Naeem Panjutha asserted that the Adiala Jail Superintendent will follow your instructions. According to the JUDGE, matters must be seen if more lawyers than the Chief PTI attend meetings.
According to the lawyer, Cipher case is being handled in secret, and media coverage is not permitted. The judge declared that the case was under the “Secret Act,” which was passed in 1923 and which we did not create.
According to Naeem Panjutha, lawyers should be permitted to attend the hearing in jail, if not journalists.
The “ADIALA JAIL” COURT room, according to Attorney Naeem, is incredibly tiny. The judge stated that either the ROOM or the wall of the –PTI Chief– cell was broken.
According to Naeem Panjutha, the Superintendent declares Jail John to be in danger while making excuses to show the Chief PTI the {JUDICIAL COMPLEX}. The judge declared that since Chief PTI is a significant individual, it is critical to preserve his life.
The Attorney Naeem Panjotha said that the Chief PTI was not given security by the same institutions; the matter is currently pending in the High Court. They have given full security to Nawaz Sharif, but Chief PTI used to bring his own security, Atta Tarr used to come as well, and bottles were thrown. The administration should be providing security for Chief PTI, but they are not.
The Chief PTI’s life must be protected by law, according to Judge Abul Hasnat of the OFFICIAL SECRET ACT Special Court. I spent an hour in ATTOCK JAIL speaking with Chief PTI. Feeling secure in prison: head over there or ask Chief PTI; didn’t he tell me that I was safe in prison? The Superintendent of Jail should also see the statement about Chief PTI’s safety in custody. Up until this point, the CASE has proceeded quite smoothly by safeguarding Chief PTI’s life. While advocating is easy, sitting in the judge’s chair is challenging. I have been an advocate for 20 years.
In the Islamabad High Court, the judge inquired as to whether Chairman PTI was subject to any directives. The attorney stated that the Islamabad High Court is still considering our cases.
“Tell me a meeting request that I rejected?” the judge asked. The attorney stated that you turned down requests to be released on bond and to have the indictment stayed.
The judge instructed us not to discuss the legal requests, but rather to focus on the meeting-related requests. Applying a bitter, bitter, tho tho.
A judge named Abul Hasnat Disseminate guidelines to the Superintendent Jail about the PTI Chief meeting.