The Athar Minallah, who is a Supreme Court Justice, has issued a detailed judgment in the case of automatic notice of postponement of elections in Punjab and KP, in which it is stated that this case was rejected by 3-4. said that it has exposed the court to many political controversies regarding investigating the automatic notice case.
The detailed judgment issued by Justice Athar Minallah consists of 25 lines.
It has been said that any politician wins or loses disputes in the court instead of forums and here the court is defeated in every case while the Supreme Court as well as all other institutions should be held responsible for the constitution and law.
He further said that the Supreme Court of Pakistan has not learned any lesson from the past events, now it is time to step back from its responsibilities and take the help of judiciousness as our country is currently immersed in political crisis. .
NOTE: Court should also Look at the Conduct and Good Faith of the Political Petitioner:
Apart from this, in the detailed note that has been issued, it has been said that the case of election in Punjab and KP is dismissed and 3 reasons have been presented for dismissal by the Full Court using Article 184 3C. The principles were binding on the bench and the court should better address the issues of interest of all the political parties and the court should also see how good the petitioner.
Further, Justice Athar Manullah said that taking automatic notice means that the apolitical and illegal actions in the country should be sold and the previous decisions should be abolished, but this is not possible, however, within the people again. An attempt can be made to raise a hope and the case of postponing the date of election was only made of disputes and all this was done politically. It was also said that Justice Yahya was absolutely right that the court should Care should be taken in notice case.
Punjab or KP Election by Itself Notice was Rejected by four to three:
It further said that this case was rejected by 3-4 and Justice Minullah said that I fully agree with the words of Justice Mansoor and Justice Jamal that the Supreme Court has become the center for solving all political disputes. On February 27, I was told that I would attend the bench and on February 23, Justice Yahya’s separate note also came out in which he had dismissed these applications.
The Formation of a Full Court would Maintain Public Confidence:
Apart from this, Justice Athar also said in this judgment that I neither gave any unnecessary reason nor left the bench and in this case I also expressed my opinion and the court should avoid these difficulties. Therefore, the option of a full court was given, if the full court was made, then the public’s trust would also be built.
Let us tell you that in the hearing on February 23, Justice Minullah had separated from the bench and had also issued a note.
A 9-judge bench was constituted in this case, in which 4 judges separated from the bench and dismissed the notice on its own.