Let us tell you that the previous hearing in which a 9-member bench was constituted was broken because Justice Mazahar as well as Justice Atharmanullah also refused to hear the statement in this case and a five-member bench was constituted on February 28. It has been given that the case is being heard under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
Today, it is hoped that this case will be completely resolved because in the previous hearing, Chief Justice Umar Atta clarified that the Supreme Court wants to end this bench case because it is too late before the election. It has been done, and no decision has been heard.
The five-member bench, which was constituted for today’s hearing, includes Justice Umar Atta, Muneeb Akhtar and three other justices.
When the last hearing was held, the Chief Justice said that there is only one question going on in the case, which is who has the right to give the date of the election. So also present the reason for it.
While giving his remarks, the Chief Justice said that the Parliament has clearly written in consideration of the Election Act that the President of Pakistan can also give the date of the election since the dissolution of the Assembly and then the 90 days will end on April 13.
You went on to say that the Supreme Court took automatic notice after giving the date of Arif Alvi’s election on February 23, which was taken due to the delay of the election in both assemblies.
When the discussion of the case started in the SC today, the “Attorney General” started talking about the SCBR whose name is Abid Zuberi. He said that the SC Bar President was thrown out by the order of the court.
On this, the CJ said that the SC, which is an institute of the Bar Association, knows it as a foundation or whatever is printed in the court is not called an order of the court because unless a judge signs it, it is not a court.
Also, when Abid Zuberi gave his statement, he said that the “Supreme Court” has already ordered that ELECTION should be held in ninety days.
On this, the CJ whose name is Jamal Mandukhel said that the ‘governor’ or the (PRESIDENT) should take any decision, but it is their duty to take to suggest of the cabinet.
In response, the second (chief justice) said that the constitution allows that the governor is not bound to appoint the current GOV or fix the ELECTION date.
Justice Mazhar Ali asked who will give the order to break the ASSEMBLY , on which the president of the SC said that the decision will be taken by the LS. Why was the time wasted when the assembly was BREAK?
Also, when “Justice Mansoor” Ali asked whether the caretaker CM can suggest the GOVERNOR on the date of the election or whether the governor can reject to suggest of the caretaker GOV, Abid replied that it is not the job of the GOV. Rather GOV affairs have to be managed or the date of election can be given only by the Governor or not by the CM.