The SC is Hearing the 9 Petitions Filed in relation to the Practice and Procedure Act, or state TV is broadcasting the Hearing Live.
Let us inform you that Justice Qazi Faiz Scheduled a Hearing on the SC “Practice and Procedure Act” before the “FULL COURT” when he took office, making it the 1st time in HISTORY that a hearing was broadcast live.
These applications are being heard by the FULL COURT, which is presided over by Justice QAZI in the SC. When the hearing got underway, the CJ said that we had to wrap up this case today since we could not continue to pursue it. because the SC has a large number of CASES.
While the power of the “Chief Justice” or the power of the —–Parliament- are both Face to Face, the CHIEF JUSTICE said that this LAW would only effect the CJ or 2 Senior Judges in this case.
In addition, Justice Faiz said that the Attorney General and LAWYERS must appear before us in order for us to hear their arguments.
Ikram Chaudhry then proceeded to Read the News on the EX PM, to which the CJ said, “Do not read this news because it has no bearing on the case and do not use the COURT for (Political Discussion).” Only legal arguments are required.
Justice Qazi added, “Some People Think that the SC or Parliament have come FACE to FACE,” or, “Now the SC Practice and Procedure has Become a Law,” and added, “I do not want to enter any other discussion at all.” Whether the Constitution has anything to do with PRACTISE AND PROCEDURE.
The Chief Justice said that if the Court can recognize the Constitutional Amendments, the CASE is over. Is this thing right for the People, or not? Let us state that the COURT’s freedom is exclusively for us and that it must be justified in all respects if the court’s FREEDOM is to be for the People. Looking might be beneficial.
Submission of Responses to the court by the Parties
Justice Isai then Remarked that legislators is making it very difficult for justice to perform its job. You should reassure us that our Freedom is sufficient and unrelated to everybody else because the legislature and the judiciary are Separate Organization, Justice Isai stated.
The Muslim League-N and the AG have appealed to uphold the Act, while the PTI or the petitioners have deemed the Act null and void Requested to offer. The Parties have Delivered all of their Responses to the Supreme Court.
In response to the JUDGES’ inquiries, the AG stated that the bill was declared unconstitutional by an 8-Judge bench because to the Independence of the judiciary guaranteed by the Practice and Procedure Act.
Please understand that the #PETITIONS opposing the Practice and Procedure have been requested to be withdrawn by both the Muslim League-N or Q.
In addition, PTI’s response stated that the “Practice and Procedure Act” is in conflict with the Independence of the JUDICIARY or that the SC Rules, 1980 prevent the Parliament from passing laws for the Supreme Court.