In the SC, which is presided over by CJP Qazi Faiz Isa, the HEARING on the Petitions Challenging the Practice and Procedure Act has begun.
A FULL COURT Hearing is Being Held by the SC on @PETITIONS opposed to the (Practice and Procedure Act).
Abid Zuberi, president of the SC BAR Association, is Arguing his Case.
The “SUPREME COURT” alone has the Power to amend the Rules within the parameters of the current Legislation, According to the ustice Ijazul Hassan, who noted that Parliament Cannot invent Rules or Legislate to make Rules.
According to the CJP, the Constitution grants the SC the POWER to establish its Own procedural or substantive standards.
While the (CJP) was speaking to Abid Zubiri, he remarked, “Time is short; Answer my question quickly.” Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said that the Law of PAK Already obliges the Supreme Court to issue verdict in line with the Constitution or LAW. What impact does it have on the decision-making process?
Even if the phrase “making Rules According to the Constitutional or Law” were deleted from the Constitution, According to attorney Abid Zuberi, it would not change anything. Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said, “It’s fine, the answer has come; move on to the Next Point.”
Justice Ijazul Hassan said that there is Another Question: may the SCP infringe on the jurisdiction of the ‘Parliament’ or pass a law? Abid Zuberi answered that if the Parliament may adopt @legislation connected to the (Supreme Court) as mentioned in Article 191, then it is correct. We need to determine which ORGINZATION the Constitution constrains. The Constitution also Gives the SC the Authority to provide rulings that adhere to the law or Constitution.
Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan Questioned whether the –Supreme Court’s– norms could be altered by LAW Given that the Parliament had granted it the Authority to create them.
Justice Qazi Faiz Isa stated that the &Hearing must be concluded today and that he needed to hear from the attorneys OR the Justices about what they intended to include in their Ruling after Abid Zuberi Stated that the “SUPREME COURT” norms could not be amended by Legislation.
While CJ Qazi Faizi Isa stated that Today we are Hearing this CASE or the Burden of CASES in our Organization grows and Today the Case is Being heard, Justice Muneeb Akhtar stated that attachment to make Rules According to the Constitution or LAW Means that Rules will be created According to the Existing Law. Finish your justifications by 11 o’clock.
Have you filed written evidence, the CJP enquired? In response to the statement made by Abid Zubari that he Had Just filed his Written answer, Qazi Faiz Isa stated that the Court had previously ordered that written arguments be provided. Since numerous papers have already been confiscated, in whatever nation does it occur that during the @CASE Hearing a Written Response be submitted? Everything includes references to US OR international Courts.
The Attorney Abid Zuberi stated that he intended to refer to the {New Jersey Court’s} Ruling, to Which Justice Qazi Faiz Isa responded, “At the very Least, refer to the Ruling of the US SC; Do Not Lower our Level to the extent that you present the RULING of the NEW JERSEY COURT as an authority.”
It should be emphasized that the Hearing will probably be finished today if the attorneys finish their arguments, or “Chief Justice” has promised to wrap up the Matter today.